|
 
XFX Nvdia 6600 GT
128meg PCI-e
02/15/06
Page 3 Performance
Performance:
What we are going to do to test the performance of this video card is
run a few synthetic benchmarks as well as compare actual game play to a
X800 on the same system. some of our results will be comparisons other
will be just strait results.. The system we are going to use has an ABIT
Fatal1ty motherboard with 1.5 gig of OCZ memory all clocked by SPD and a
4400 X2 dual core AMD 64 bit CPU. We might throw in a few other scores
with our 3500+ AMD 64bit CPU as well if it is not in the review there
will probably be published results on the results page..
First we will run the full gamut Future Mark and
PassMark synthetic test suites these are designed to keep the testing
static so results can be compared without compromise. Bellow you will
see how well the 6600GT performs against the X800 now keep in mind the
X800 is a bit higher in price and performance should be better..
PassMark
 
http://www.passmark.com
Performance Test 6.0
As you can see the 6600GT performs very
well against the X800 in some aspects better.
Future Mark
3DMark03
|
Benchmark |
|
Width |
1280 |
1280 |
|
|
Height |
1024 |
1024 |
|
|
Anti-Aliasing |
None |
None |
|
|
Post-Processing |
No |
No |
|
|
Texture Filtering |
Optimal |
Optimal |
|
|
Max Anisotropy |
4 |
4 |
|
|
Vertex Shaders |
Optimal |
Optimal |
|
|
Force PS 1.1 in GT2 & GT3 |
No |
No |
|
|
Repeat Tests |
Off |
Off |
|
|
Fixed Framerate |
Off |
Off |
|
|
Comment |
|
|
|
| |
X800 Brvo 256meg |
XFX 6600gt 128meg |
|
|
3DMark Score |
6934 3DMarks |
6491 3DMarks |
Game Tests |
|
GT1 - Wings of Fury |
203.4 FPS |
193.6 FPS |
Game Tests |
|
GT2 - Battle of Proxycon |
45.2 FPS |
44.7 FPS |
Game Tests |
|
GT3 - Troll's Lair |
39.4 FPS |
38.4 FPS |
Game Tests |
|
GT4 - Mother Nature |
49.7 FPS |
41.8 FPS |
Game Tests |
|
CPU Score |
969 CPUMarks |
1105 CPUMarks |
CPU Tests |
|
CPU Test 1 |
103.4 FPS |
123.1 FPS |
CPU Tests |
|
CPU Test 2 |
18.0 FPS |
19.6 FPS |
CPU Tests |
|
Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) |
1901.6 MTexels/s |
1679.6 MTexels/s |
Feature Tests |
|
Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) |
4151.5 MTexels/s |
3914.3 MTexels/s |
Feature Tests |
|
Vertex Shader |
30.4 FPS |
22.7 FPS |
Feature Tests |
|
Pixel Shader 2.0 |
55.8 FPS |
90.9 FPS |
Feature Tests |
|
Ragtroll |
25.4 FPS |
27.1 FPS |
Feature Tests |
|
No sounds |
67.6 FPS |
68.1 FPS |
Sound Tests |
|
24 sounds |
61.0 FPS |
61.0 FPS |
Sound Tests |
|
60 sounds |
0.0 FPS |
0.0 FPS |
Sound Tests |
Again like the Pass Mark software the
XFX6600gt performs very close to the ATI X800
3DMark05
|
Benchmark |
|
|
|
|
Width |
1024 |
1024 |
|
|
Height |
768 |
768 |
|
|
Anti-Aliasing |
None |
None |
|
|
Anti-Aliasing Quality |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Texture Filtering |
Optimal |
Optimal |
|
|
Max Anisotropy |
4 |
4 |
|
|
VS Profile |
2_0 |
3_0 |
|
|
PS Profile |
2_b |
3_0 |
|
|
Force Full Precision |
No |
No |
|
|
Disable DST |
No |
No |
|
|
Disable Post-Processing |
No |
No |
|
|
Force Software Vertex Shader |
No |
No |
|
|
Color Mipmaps |
No |
No |
|
|
Repeat Tests |
Off |
Off |
|
|
Fixed Framerate |
Off |
Off |
|
|
Comment |
|
|
|
| |
X800 Brvo 256meg |
XFX 6600gt 128meg |
|
|
3DMark Score |
4259 3DMarks |
3631 3DMarks |
Game Tests |
|
GT1 - Return To Proxycon |
19.1 FPS |
16.2 FPS |
Game Tests |
|
GT2 - Firefly Forest |
12.9 FPS |
10.2 FPS |
Game Tests |
|
GT3 - Canyon Flight |
20.0 FPS |
18.5 FPS |
Game Tests |
|
CPU Score |
5554 CPUMarks |
6345 CPUMarks |
CPU Tests |
|
CPU Test 1 |
3.1 FPS |
3.4 FPS |
CPU Tests |
|
CPU Test 2 |
4.4 FPS |
5.2 FPS |
CPU Tests |
|
Fill Rate - Single-Texturing |
2135.6 MTexels/s |
1885.3 MTexels/s |
Feature Tests |
|
Fill Rate - Multi-Texturing |
4672.9 MTexels/s |
3979.9 MTexels/s |
Feature Tests |
|
Pixel Shader |
85.6 FPS |
101.3 FPS |
Feature Tests |
|
Vertex Shader - Simple |
41.9 MVertices/s |
37.1 MVertices/s |
Feature Tests |
|
Vertex Shader - Complex |
36.7 MVertices/s |
24.9 MVertices/s |
Feature Tests |
|
8 Triangles |
12.5 MTriangles/s |
2.7 MTriangles/s |
Batch Size Tests |
|
32 Triangles |
47.6 MTriangles/s |
8.7 MTriangles/s |
Batch Size Tests |
|
128 Triangles |
124.2 MTriangles/s |
26.4 MTriangles/s |
Batch Size Tests |
|
512 Triangles |
127.7 MTriangles/s |
56.5 MTriangles/s |
Batch Size Tests |
|
2048 Triangles |
128.7 MTriangles/s |
76.1 MTriangles/s |
Batch Size Tests |
|
32768 Triangles |
129.1 MTriangles/s |
85.4 MTriangles/s |
Batch Size Tests |
In the Direct X
9.0 are or 3DMark05 scores the 6600 doe fall a bit sort but considering
the price difference and that the 6600 has 1/2 the ram of the X800 the
scores speak for themself.
The second portion of testing we will use a tool from
Hard OCP now this is a hybrid using Unreal Demo with a script to run and
read the results. Hard OCP has some of the best stuff they real have
there act together. Thanks for the tool guys.. Now back to the results
bellow are the basic results using 1280 and 1600 dpi results... The
results use both OpenGL and DirectX and as you can see the 6600GT does a
great job especially for the price.
Open GL Results
Low FPS
| Resolution |
dm-antalus |
dm-asbestos |
ctf-citadel |
| 1280x1024 |
51.466995 |
26.518740 |
52.395412 |
| 1600x1200 |
51.714115 |
25.461538 |
52.523056 |
Average FPS
| Resolution |
dm-antalus |
dm-asbestos |
ctf-citadel |
| 1280x1024 |
60.077560 |
60.114899 |
60.088943 |
| 1600x1200 |
60.058357 |
60.052902 |
60.070110 |
High FPS
| Resolution |
dm-antalus |
dm-asbestos |
ctf-citadel |
| 1280x1024 |
69.451729 |
212.196823 |
68.646301 |
| 1600x1200 |
69.361336 |
214.438843 |
69.455147 |
This test was run using the High Quality
Option
This test was run using the OpenGL Rendering Engine
This test was run using the demo version of Unreal Tournament 2003
This test was run using the Custom_MaxDetail.ini provided by [H]ard|OCP
Direct X
Results
Low FPS
| Resolution |
dm-antalus |
dm-asbestos |
ctf-citadel |
| 1280x1024 |
91.487221 |
107.942947 |
80.402817 |
| 1600x1200 |
62.930824 |
82.575394 |
72.477066 |
Average FPS
| Resolution |
dm-antalus |
dm-asbestos |
ctf-citadel |
| 1280x1024 |
192.532288 |
297.264221 |
195.430984 |
| 1600x1200 |
141.129456 |
232.256241 |
161.725082 |
High FPS
| Resolution |
dm-antalus |
dm-asbestos |
ctf-citadel |
| 1280x1024 |
1333.92419 |
921.391113 |
531.482056 |
| 1600x1200 |
1178.41735 |
716.796570 |
602.606262 |
This test was run using the High Quality
Option
This test was run using the Direct3D Rendering Engine
This test was run using the demo version of Unreal Tournament 2003
This test was run using the Custom_MaxDetail.ini provided by [H]ard|OCP
Last was the real game play bellow are a few screen
shots using both the X800 and the 6600GT one thing I
have always noticed is especially in games like EverQuest 2 the
resolution of the two chipsets are so different you can get into an
argument over who likes what for hours that being said you can decide
for yourself keep in mind the graphics setting are as close to identical
between the two cards.
3DMark05
XFX
6600GT PowerColorX800 Bravo
EverQuest 2
XFX
6600GT PowerColorX800 Bravo
Star Wars Knights of the Old
Republic
XFX
6600GT PowerColorX800 Bravo
|
System Info |
|
|
Version |
3.6 |
|
CPU Info |
|
|
Central Processing Unit |
|
|
Manufacturer |
AMD |
|
Family |
AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4400+ |
|
Architecture |
64-bit |
|
Internal Clock |
2210 MHz |
|
Internal Clock Maximum |
3000 MHz |
|
External Clock |
201 MHz |
|
Socket Designation |
Socket 939 |
|
Type |
|
|
Upgrade |
|
|
HyperThreadingTechnology |
Available - 2 Logical Processors |
|
Capabilities |
MMX, CMov, RDTSC, 3DNow!, Extended 3DNow!,
SSE, SSE2, PAE, NX |
|
Version |
AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4400+ |
Page
1 /
Page 2 /
Page 4
Company
Info
XFX Online Services
XFX Technologies, Inc.
18567 East Gale Ave
City Of Industry, CA 91748
U.S.A
Telephone: (626)912-9100
Marns
CDA
By
pr101j
|
