Services

Web Stuff

Networking

Custom PC's

Modification

Upgrades

Onsite Diagnostics

Back Up/Storage

Sponsor & Affiliates Info

Extras

Past Sponsors

Affiliates

Reviews

Articles

Guides

Contests

Message Board

Affiliate News

Local Gamming 

& 

LAN Party Sites

reLANtless.net

RITFest.net

PowerColor ATI Radeon X800VIVO

Bravo Edition  256meg PCI-e Video card

Sponsored

by

PowerColor

   PowerColor has quickly become one of the main manufacturers of ATI video cards in the past few years. This reputation has been built up because of there extra efforts in making their products better then the rest... We got our hands on one of their X800 Bravo series video devices and wanted to see if all the good comments are warranted and just how good this product is..

Specs:

Memory & Bus Width 256MB GDDR 3 256 bit
Core Speed 392MHz
Memory Speed 350MHz x2
Output Dual DVI / TV Out / CRT by converter / VIVO / HDTV
Interface PCIEx16
Pixel Pipelines 12
Direct X Support 9
TV Connector S-Video

Features

Price: Directron.com Price 389.00 USD Purchase Link

Installation:

   When discussing installation of a video card there really isn't much to say when dealing with the hardware. But when you install the software especially with a video card such as the X800 VI/VO models there are allot of different aspects worth some extra mention...

   Lets start with the drivers. PowerColor uses your standard Catalyst drivers so nothing new here the install is pretty easy and I had no errors when running the standard setup. Not after the drivers are loaded and the PC reboots the getting started ATI menu / help page pops up. This feature is a slightly boring but very good read provided by ATI if you ever have any question concerning features and the functionality of the video card.. Also not when going into the display properties the large number of settings and tabs the X800 has. I am not going to get into the tweaks and extras do the the sheer number of settings available but let me tell you they all seemed to work very well and allow anyone to control every aspect of this piece of hardware...

   Also part of the driver installation is what ATI calls a Catalyst Control Panel. You can access this software by double clicking on the ATI symbol on the lower right corner of your task bar. This control panel is a nice way to make editing the video preferences in a more user friendly manner. All your major features are provided from display modes to 3d performance trial to see what exactly you lose when using different display settings. This utility is much better then hacking threw the display drivers for someone that might not have any idea what anti aliasing or dithering or such stuff is used for. I definitely recommend trying it out it is very easy to use and makes setting changes a novelty

.

   Another great piece of software provided with this unit is the CyberLink DVD Solution this is good for all sorts of DV decoding rendering splicing and editing. The reason for this software is to utilize the DV capture recorder on the X800. PowerColor provides all the hardware and software necessary to make this bundle work. This software is very easy to use . After importing your video and audio streams the snip its of media can be dragged and altered in the order you want cutting and editing is a snap.  This software also comes with over lays and plug-inn's to make your video project  even better..

   The last part of installation I wanted to cover was just some info about the actual wring hook-up for the S-Video out and Capture adapters. PowerColor provides everything needed to perform these tasks lots of extra wires to do any type of install possible, and installation is very easy. Just take the desired wire input/output plug it into the center S-Video connection on the card itself and then hook the wires up to your TV or camcorder depending on your desired setup.. They even labeled the wires to make less confusion when hooking your devices up to the video card.

Appearance:

   PowerColor makes their products very similar to the ATI models in look in feel. In this models case PowerColor uses a simple yet effective cooling system to keep this card from overheating. the board itself is ATI red and even the packaging is pretty much the stock ATI look. So basically what I am trying to say is PowerColor isn't into the flash and glitter but what they lack in flare they make up for in performance...

   The heat sink itself is has a pressure bar securing it to the rear of the card so if you decide on adding an extra cooler removal of the stock sink is very easy to do and unless you have some serious static charge I can't see damaging the unit doing this..

Performance:

   What we did for the performance section of this test is run both real game macros and systemic benchmarks as well. The FutureMark results where compared to an AGP nVidia 6600GT so you can see the kind of performance increase you will get between the two cards. All our results may vary from what you have encountered at home and please note that this test was run using only default settings there are many ways to achieve better results to many to document here so we chose to use the setting a person would encounter when doing a base install...

~Unreal Tournament 2003~

   For the Unreal 2003 benchmark we used a very nice utility [H]ard|OCP uses that runs even with a demo version of UT2003. We ran the PowerColor card in both 1024 and 1280 video modes and to my surprise the 1280 mode actually had a better low farm rate then the 1024 mode. However as expected the average and high FPS rate the 1024 ran much better. Also note that in most cases the Direct3D rendering performed much better then the OpenGL...

High Quality mode Direct3D & Open GL

Low Quality mode Direct3D & Open GL

Low FPS

Average FPS

High FPS

This test was run using the Direct3D & OpenGL Rendering Engine
This test was run using the demo version of Unreal Tournament 2003

This test was run using utility provided by [H]ard|OCP

~FutureMark Benchmarking Results~

   As I mentioned earlier we did use a multi compare between the nVidia 6600GT and the X800  and I know they are not of the same class but it does show what kind of performance increase you should expect jumping from the AGP Socket 754 setup to the PCI-e 939 socket setup.. If you are not familiar with FutureMark software let me give you a brief explanation of the different programs.. 3DMark2001 is an older version of the 3DMark line of tools this tool focuses on the DirectX7.0 line of 3D engines comparatively as the software gets newer so does the primary testing focus for example 3DMark03 is geared towards DirectX8.0 and 3DMark05 is designed to push the DirectX9.0. All of these utilities use a similar structure in the way they test. Small runs of intense and moderate graphical scenes are executed and the Frames Per Second  FPS are recoded then the results are measured and a rating is given based on the performance of the video card...

System Configurations

for all FutureMark Benchmarks

	My System	Compared System
General Information
Operating System	Microsoft Windows XP	Microsoft Windows 2000
DirectX Version	9.0c	9.0c
Mobo Manufacturer	http://www.abit.com.tw/	soyocomputer
Mobo Model	AN8 Series(NF-CK804)	nForce
AGP Rates (Current/Available)	0x /	0x /
CPU	AMD Athlon(tm) 64 2009 MHz	AMD Athlon(tm) 64 2220 MHz
FSB	201 MHz	203 MHz
Memory	1024 MB	1024 MB
Display Information
Graphics Chipset	ATI RADEON X800	NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT
Driver Name	RADEON X800 Series	NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT
Driver Version	6.14.10.6490	6.6.9.3
Driver Status	WHQL - FM Approved	Non WHQL - Not FM Approved
Video Memory	256 MB	128 MB
Core Clock	392 MHz	299 MHz
Memory Clock	351 MHz	1002 MHz
Sound Information
Sound Adapter Driver Name	Realtek AC97 Audio	C-Media Wave Device
Sound Adapter Driver Version	5.10.0.5770	5.12.1.42

~3DMark01Pro SE Build 3.0~

Detailed Test Results

Program Version	3DMark2001 SE	3DMark2001 SE
Resolution	1024x768 32bit	1024x768 32bit
Texture Format	Compressed	Compressed
FSAA	Disabled	Disabled
Z-Buffer Depth	24bit	24bit
Frame Buffer	Double	Double
Rendering Pipeline	D3D Pure Hardware T&L	D3D Pure Hardware T&L

3DMark Score (3D marks)	20794 17593
Game 1 - Car Chase - Low Detail (FPS)	290.5 247.2
Game 1 - Car Chase - High Detail (FPS)	93.7 84.5
Game 2 - Dragothic - Low Detail (FPS)	382.3 332.2
Game 2 - Dragothic - High Detail (FPS)	206.8 189.0
Game 3 - Lobby - Low Detail (FPS)	268.4 235.4
Game 3 - Lobby - High Detail (FPS)	119.9 105.7
Game 4 - Nature (FPS)	148.8 93.1
Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) (MTexels/s)	2174.3 1754.9
Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) (MTexels/s)	4565.1 3909.8
High Polygon Count (1 light) (MTriangels/s)	135.5 91.3
High Polygon Count (8 lights) (MTriangels/s)	29.1 18.4
Environment Bump Mapping (FPS)	541.6 242.4
DOT3 Bump Mapping (FPS)	293.3 286.5
Vertex Shader (FPS)	260.1 218.3
Pixel Shader (FPS)	348.1 308.7
Advanced Pixel Shader (FPS)	250.5 287.7
Point Sprite Speed (MSprites/s)	50.5 35.1

~3DMark03Pro Revision 6 Build 0~

Benchmark Settings
Program Version	3DMark03 Revision 6 Build 0	3DMark03 Revision 6 Build 0
Resolution	1024x768@32 bit	1024x768@32 bit
Texture Filtering	Optimal	Optimal
Pixel Processing / Antialiasing	None	None
Post Processing	false	false
Vertex Shaders	Optimal	Optimal

Main Test Results

3DMark Score (3DMarks)	8493 7821
CPU Score (CPUMarks)	901 782

Detailed Test Results

Game Tests
GT1 - Wings of Fury (fps)	238.8 214.1
GT2 - Battle of Proxycon (fps)	60.1 57.8
GT3 - Troll's Lair (fps)	49.4 49.4
GT4 - Mother Nature (fps)	56.9 46.4
CPU Tests
CPU Test 1 (fps)	106.0 93.1
CPU Test 2 (fps)	15.1 12.9
Feature Tests
Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) (MTexels/s)	1805.8 1641.6
Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) (MTexels/s)	4012.9 3891.4
Vertex Shader (fps)	27.8 22.1
Pixel Shader 2.0 (fps)	76.3 107.7
Ragtroll (fps)	37.8 33.1
Sound Tests
No sounds (fps)	66.6 Not Supported
24 sounds (fps)	58.8 Not Supported
60 sounds (fps)	Not Supported Not Supported